The comparison of Beretta’s 686 and 687 over-and-under shotguns represents a common point of discussion for those interested in sporting firearms, especially for pursuits like hunting and clay shooting. These models, both renowned for their quality and performance, often present a challenging choice due to their subtle yet significant differences.
Distinguishing between these two models empowers informed purchasing decisions. Understanding the nuances in their design, features, intended use, and associated price points contributes significantly to shooter satisfaction and effectiveness in the field or on the range. This comparison frequently arises within online forums, gun shops, and shooting clubs, highlighting its relevance to the sporting community.
This discussion will delve into the specifics of each model, highlighting key differences in areas such as receiver design, stock dimensions, engraving patterns, intended use, and pricing. A thorough exploration of these aspects will equip readers with the knowledge necessary to differentiate between these two esteemed Beretta shotguns and select the model best suited to their individual needs and preferences.
1. Receiver Design
Receiver design represents a critical point of distinction between the Beretta 686 and 687 shotguns. While both utilize a low-profile receiver design contributing to improved handling and pointability, subtle variations exist that influence aesthetics, durability, and potentially, cost.
-
Engraving
The 687 often exhibits more elaborate engraving patterns compared to the 686, which typically features simpler, more understated designs. This difference primarily impacts aesthetic appeal and can influence pricing, with more intricately engraved models commanding higher values. For example, a 687 Sporting model might showcase game scenes or scrollwork, while a 686 field model might have a simpler, more functional engraving pattern.
-
Metal Finish
While both models utilize durable finishes, variations exist in the specific type and application. The 687 might feature a high-gloss blued finish or a case-colored hardening treatment, enhancing its visual appeal. The 686 may utilize a more matte finish, prioritizing practicality and corrosion resistance in field conditions. This difference impacts the overall look and potentially the long-term maintenance requirements.
-
Receiver Material
Both models typically employ high-strength steel alloys, though specific formulations might differ slightly. These subtle variations can influence the receivers overall weight and durability, potentially impacting the shotguns balance and longevity. These differences are often not readily apparent but can become significant over the lifetime of the firearm.
-
Internal Components
While the core locking mechanisms share similarities, subtle differences in internal components, like the ejectors and firing pins, can exist between models and even within specific model variations over different production years. These distinctions, while often minor, can influence the shotguns reliability and maintenance requirements over time. For instance, some models might feature automatic ejectors while others utilize extractors.
Understanding the nuances in receiver design between the 686 and 687 provides valuable insight into the overall quality, aesthetics, and intended purpose of each model. Careful consideration of these factors contributes to a more informed decision when selecting a shotgun for specific shooting disciplines and personal preferences.
2. Stock Dimensions
Stock dimensions represent a crucial point of comparison between the Beretta 686 and 687 shotguns, significantly influencing shooter comfort, gun mount consistency, and overall accuracy. Variations in length of pull, drop at comb, and cast can impact how the shotgun aligns with the shooter’s physique and shooting style. These seemingly minor differences can have profound effects on target acquisition and shot placement.
Length of pull, the distance between the trigger and the butt pad, directly affects the shooter’s ability to achieve a proper cheek weld and sight picture. A stock that is too long or too short can lead to discomfort, inconsistent gun mounting, and ultimately, reduced accuracy. Drop at comb, the vertical distance between the comb of the stock and the imaginary line extending along the rib, influences the shooter’s vertical point of aim. An incorrect drop at comb can result in shots impacting high or low. Cast, the horizontal deviation of the stock, accommodates variations in shooter facial structure and eye dominance. A properly fitted stock, considering cast, promotes a natural and comfortable shooting posture.
While both the 686 and 687 offer various stock configurations, certain models may cater to specific shooting disciplines or physical builds. For instance, a sporting clays model might feature an adjustable comb and a longer length of pull to accommodate a more upright shooting stance. A field model intended for upland hunting might have a shorter length of pull for quicker handling in dense cover. Understanding the relationship between stock dimensions and shooting performance is essential for selecting the appropriate model. Careful consideration of these factors, possibly including professional gun fitting, can significantly enhance shooting comfort, accuracy, and overall enjoyment.
3. Intended Purpose
Understanding the intended purpose of a shotgun is paramount when comparing the Beretta 686 and 687. Both models demonstrate versatility, yet specific variants cater to different shooting disciplines, influencing stock configuration, barrel length, and overall weight. A 686 designed for field use might prioritize lightweight maneuverability and shorter barrels for quick handling in brush, while a 687 Sporting model might emphasize a longer barrel, adjustable comb, and heavier overall weight for enhanced stability and target acquisition on the sporting clays course. Choosing between these models requires careful consideration of the intended application. Hunting upland birds presents different demands than competitive clay shooting, necessitating specific features that optimize performance in each scenario.
For example, a hunter pursuing pheasants in dense cover might favor the 686’s lighter weight and shorter barrels for quick target acquisition and maneuverability through thick brush. Conversely, a competitive sporting clays shooter might prefer the 687 Sporting model’s adjustable comb and longer barrels, providing a more customized fit and increased stability for demanding clay presentations. Recognizing these distinctions allows for informed decisions tailored to individual shooting needs and preferences. Ignoring the intended purpose can lead to a mismatch between the shotgun and its application, hindering performance and potentially compromising shooter satisfaction. A skeet shooter using a heavily engraved 687 intended for hunting might find the gun unnecessarily heavy and cumbersome, while a hunter using a lightweight 686 field model for trap shooting might find the gun lacking in stability for consistent long-range performance.
Selecting the appropriate shotgun requires careful analysis of intended use. This understanding, combined with knowledge of specific model variations within the 686 and 687 lines, ensures optimal performance and shooter satisfaction. Evaluating intended use alongside other factors, such as budget and personal preferences, empowers informed decisions that align with individual shooting goals and contribute to long-term enjoyment of the sport.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the distinctions between the Beretta 686 and 687 shotgun models, aiming to provide clarity and facilitate informed purchasing decisions.
Question 1: What are the primary differences between the 686 and 687?
Key differences often reside in receiver aesthetics, stock dimensions, and intended purpose. The 687 frequently features more elaborate engraving and may offer specialized sporting configurations. Stock dimensions can vary, influencing comfort and fit. Specific models within each line cater to different shooting disciplines.
Question 2: Which model is better for field hunting?
While both can be suitable, the 686 often presents a lighter, more field-oriented option with features prioritizing maneuverability and quick handling. Specific 686 models are tailored for hunting applications.
Question 3: Is the 687 better suited for competitive shooting?
Certain 687 variants, particularly Sporting models, are designed for competitive disciplines like sporting clays and skeet, often featuring adjustable combs, longer barrels, and enhanced stability features.
Question 4: Do these models differ in build quality or reliability?
Both models are generally recognized for their robust construction and reliability. Differences typically relate to features and intended use rather than inherent quality discrepancies.
Question 5: How do prices compare between the 686 and 687?
Pricing typically varies based on specific model, condition, and features. 687 models, particularly those with elaborate engraving or specialized sporting features, may command higher prices.
Question 6: Which model is easier to maintain?
Maintenance requirements are generally similar for both models, involving regular cleaning and lubrication. Specific features, such as adjustable components, might require additional attention.
Careful consideration of individual shooting needs, preferences, and budget is crucial when selecting between these models. Consulting with experienced shooters or firearm professionals can further enhance decision-making.
The subsequent section will provide a detailed comparison table outlining specific features and specifications of various 686 and 687 models.
Tips for Selecting Between a Beretta 686 and 687
Choosing between a Beretta 686 and 687 requires careful evaluation of individual needs and priorities. The following tips offer guidance through this decision-making process.
Tip 1: Define the Primary Shooting Application: Clarity regarding intended use is paramount. Hunting applications often favor the 686’s lighter weight and quicker handling. Competitive shooting disciplines might benefit from the 687’s specialized features and adjustable components.
Tip 2: Evaluate Stock Dimensions and Fit: Stock dimensions significantly impact comfort and accuracy. Consider professional gun fitting to ensure proper length of pull, drop at comb, and cast dimensions, particularly for the 687’s adjustable options.
Tip 3: Assess Receiver Aesthetics and Preferences: The 687 often exhibits more elaborate engraving, impacting aesthetic appeal and potentially increasing cost. Consider personal preferences regarding ornamentation and its influence on overall value.
Tip 4: Research Specific Model Variations: Both the 686 and 687 offer various configurations tailored to specific purposes. Researching these variations within each model line ensures alignment with intended use and desired features.
Tip 5: Establish a Budget and Explore Pricing: Prices can vary significantly based on model, condition, and features. Establish a realistic budget early in the decision-making process to narrow down options effectively.
Tip 6: Handle and Inspect Potential Purchases: Whenever possible, handle and inspect prospective shotguns. This hands-on experience provides valuable insight into balance, feel, and overall quality, supplementing online research.
Tip 7: Seek Expert Advice from Experienced Shooters: Consulting experienced shooters or firearm professionals can provide valuable perspectives and insights, especially when differentiating between specific models within the 686 and 687 lines.
Careful consideration of these factors empowers informed decisions aligning with individual shooting needs, preferences, and budgetary constraints.
The concluding section will summarize key distinctions and offer final recommendations for selecting the optimal Beretta shotgun.
Concluding Remarks
Discerning the nuances between the Beretta 686 and 687 shotguns requires careful consideration of intended use, stock dimensions, receiver aesthetics, and specific model variations. While both represent quality firearms renowned for reliability and performance, subtle yet significant differences cater to distinct shooting disciplines and personal preferences. The 686 often presents a lighter, more field-oriented option, prioritizing maneuverability and quick handling. Conversely, the 687, particularly in Sporting configurations, offers specialized features like adjustable combs and longer barrels, enhancing stability and precision for competitive shooting. Receiver aesthetics, notably engraving patterns, further distinguish these models, influencing both visual appeal and price point.
Ultimately, selecting between these esteemed shotguns necessitates a thorough self-assessment of shooting needs, priorities, and budgetary constraints. Informed decisions, guided by careful research and hands-on evaluation, empower shooters to acquire the optimal firearm, maximizing performance and fostering long-term enjoyment of the shooting sports. A thoughtful approach to this selection process ensures a harmonious balance between individual requirements and the unique attributes of each model, ultimately contributing to a rewarding shooting experience.