The comparison of the Model 36 and Model 37 revolvers represents a classic study within the Smith & Wesson J-frame lineage. Both are five-shot, .38 Special revolvers built on the compact J-frame, known for its concealability. The chief distinction lies in the Model 36’s shrouded hammer versus the Model 37’s exposed hammer. This seemingly minor difference significantly impacts the practical application of each revolver.
This comparison is relevant for those seeking a compact, reliable personal defense firearm. The shrouded hammer of the Model 36 allows for snag-free draws from concealment, crucial in high-pressure situations. The exposed hammer of the Model 37, however, offers the option of single-action fire, providing enhanced accuracy potential for deliberate shots. Both models represent a significant chapter in the history of concealed carry revolvers, having been trusted by law enforcement and civilians for decades. Their enduring popularity speaks volumes about their effectiveness and dependability.
Further examination will delve into specific features like weight, dimensions, materials, and variations within each model line, providing a comprehensive understanding of the nuances that distinguish these two iconic revolvers and inform potential owners in their selection process.
1. Concealed Carry
Concealed carry considerations significantly influence the choice between the Smith & Wesson Model 36 and Model 37. The inherent design differences impact practicality and effectiveness in concealed carry applications.
-
Snag-Free Draw:
A primary concern in concealed carry is the potential for the firearm to snag during the draw. The Model 36’s shrouded hammer mitigates this risk, ensuring a smooth and unobstructed draw from concealment. The Model 37’s exposed hammer, while offering single-action capability, introduces a potential snag point. This factor is crucial for self-defense scenarios where fractions of a second can be paramount.
-
Holster Compatibility:
Holster options vary considerably based on the hammer configuration. The Model 36’s shrouded hammer allows for a wider range of holsters, including pocket holsters and inside-the-waistband (IWB) options that offer deep concealment. The Model 37, due to its exposed hammer, typically requires holsters designed specifically to accommodate it, potentially limiting choices.
-
Printing:
The compact J-frame, shared by both models, contributes to minimal printing (the outline of the firearm visible through clothing). However, the Model 37’s exposed hammer can sometimes create a slightly more pronounced bulge depending on clothing choice and carry position. This nuance can influence the decision-making process for individuals prioritizing deep concealment.
-
Real-World Scenarios:
Consider a self-defense situation where a rapid draw is necessary. The Model 36 offers an advantage with its snag-free design. Conversely, in a scenario allowing for a more deliberate approach, the Model 37s single-action capability might be preferable for enhanced accuracy. The specific needs and anticipated scenarios of the individual carrying the firearm are central to this decision.
Ultimately, the best choice for concealed carry depends on individual priorities and circumstances. The Model 36 emphasizes speed and ease of draw, while the Model 37 provides versatility in firing modes. Careful evaluation of these factors is critical for selecting the most appropriate revolver for concealed carry purposes.
2. Hammer Design
Hammer design represents a pivotal distinction between the Smith & Wesson Model 36 and Model 37, profoundly influencing their respective functionalities and suitability for various applications. This seemingly minor detail has significant ramifications for concealed carry, operational handling, and overall performance.
-
Shrouded Hammer (Model 36):
The Model 36’s shrouded hammer, also known as an internal or concealed hammer, minimizes the risk of snagging on clothing during a draw from concealment. This feature is paramount for personal defense scenarios where a smooth, unimpeded draw is crucial. The trade-off is the inability to cock the hammer for single-action fire, limiting the user to double-action operation. This design prioritizes speed and reliability in close-quarters engagements.
-
Exposed Hammer (Model 37):
The Model 37’s exposed hammer facilitates both single and double-action firing. Single-action mode, achieved by manually cocking the hammer, reduces trigger pull weight and enhances accuracy. This feature proves advantageous in situations that permit deliberate aiming. However, the exposed hammer increases the potential for snagging, a critical consideration for concealed carry.
-
Impact on Concealment:
The hammer design directly impacts the choice of holsters and methods of concealment. The shrouded hammer of the Model 36 permits a wider range of holster options, including pocket holsters and those designed for deep concealment. The exposed hammer of the Model 37 necessitates holsters specifically designed to accommodate it, potentially limiting options and impacting concealment effectiveness.
-
Operational Considerations:
Beyond concealed carry, the hammer design influences the handling and operation of the revolver. The Model 36’s shrouded hammer promotes a streamlined profile, ideal for quick deployment. The Model 37’s exposed hammer, while offering single-action capability, can require more deliberate handling, particularly during the draw stroke. This difference necessitates careful consideration based on the intended use case.
In summary, the hammer design constitutes a defining characteristic that distinguishes the Model 36 and Model 37. This critical feature shapes their strengths and weaknesses, ultimately determining their suitability for specific applications. Careful evaluation of these design differences is essential for selecting the revolver that best aligns with individual needs and preferences.
3. Shooting Modes
Shooting modes constitute a fundamental differentiator between the Smith & Wesson Model 36 and Model 37, directly impacting their practical application and suitability for specific purposes. This distinction arises from the core design difference: the hammer mechanism.
The Model 36, with its shrouded hammer, operates exclusively in double-action mode. Every trigger pull both cocks the hammer and releases it to fire the cartridge. This consistent trigger pull, though heavier than single-action, promotes rapid firing in high-stress self-defense situations where speed is paramount. A law enforcement officer responding to a sudden threat, for instance, benefits from the Model 36’s intuitive and rapid-firing capability. However, the heavier trigger pull can affect accuracy at longer ranges, making it less suitable for target shooting or deliberate aiming scenarios.
Conversely, the Model 37, featuring an exposed hammer, offers both single and double-action firing modes. Single-action mode, engaged by manually cocking the hammer, significantly reduces trigger pull weight, facilitating precise shot placement. This capability makes the Model 37 more versatile, suitable for both self-defense and recreational shooting. A civilian carrying the Model 37 for personal protection can utilize double-action for rapid response in close quarters, while the single-action mode allows for greater accuracy when practicing at the range. However, the manual cocking process adds a step, potentially increasing reaction time in critical self-defense situations. Choosing between these modes requires careful consideration of the context and the individual’s priorities.
In summary, the available shooting modes represent a critical factor in distinguishing the Model 36 and Model 37. The Model 36 prioritizes speed and simplicity with its exclusive double-action operation, while the Model 37 offers greater versatility with the option of single-action firing for enhanced accuracy. This core difference underscores the importance of understanding shooting modes when selecting a revolver for specific needs and applications.
4. Holster Options
Holster selection is paramount when carrying a revolver, particularly for concealed carry. The Smith & Wesson Model 36 and Model 37, despite their similar size and caliber, present distinct holster requirements due to the critical difference in hammer design. This distinction significantly impacts the available options and influences how each revolver can be carried comfortably and safely.
-
Inside-the-Waistband (IWB) Holsters:
IWB holsters are popular for concealed carry due to their ability to conceal a firearm effectively. For the Model 36, numerous IWB holsters are available, often designed for maximum concealment and a smooth draw. The shrouded hammer allows for snag-free holstering and drawing. The Model 37, with its exposed hammer, requires specific IWB holsters designed to accommodate the hammer spur, preventing accidental discharge and ensuring a consistent draw. The hammer spur can also create comfort challenges, requiring careful holster selection.
-
Pocket Holsters:
Pocket holsters offer another deep concealment option. The Model 36’s snag-free design lends itself well to pocket carry. The smooth, rounded profile of the shrouded hammer minimizes the risk of the revolver catching on pocket lining or other items. For the Model 37, pocket holsters are less ideal. The exposed hammer increases the risk of snagging and accidental discharge. Specific pocket holsters designed for exposed hammer revolvers exist, but often offer less concealment and require more care during placement and draw.
-
Outside-the-Waistband (OWB) Holsters:
OWB holsters prioritize quick access and are less suited for concealed carry with small revolvers like the Model 36 and 37. However, for open carry or range use, both models have OWB options. The Model 37’s exposed hammer can be an advantage here, allowing for thumb-cocking before drawing. OWB holsters for the Model 36 provide a secure platform for carrying, but the shrouded hammer offers fewer tactical advantages in an open-carry context.
-
Ankle Holsters:
Ankle holsters, typically used as a backup or for deep concealment, present unique challenges and advantages for both models. The Model 36’s shrouded hammer and compact size make it relatively comfortable and snag-free for ankle carry. The Model 37’s exposed hammer may be less comfortable and require more attention to secure placement and a consistent draw stroke to avoid snagging. Drawing from an ankle holster often requires more time and practice than other carry methods.
The choice of holster significantly impacts the safety, accessibility, and concealability of both the Model 36 and Model 37. Understanding the nuances of hammer design and its implications for holster selection is crucial for effective and responsible carry. Choosing the appropriate holster is as important as selecting the firearm itself, ensuring that the chosen carry method aligns with individual needs and circumstances.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the Smith & Wesson Model 36 and Model 37 revolvers, providing concise and informative responses to facilitate informed decision-making.
Question 1: What is the primary difference between the Model 36 and Model 37?
The most significant difference lies in the hammer design. The Model 36 features a shrouded (internal) hammer, while the Model 37 has an exposed hammer.
Question 2: Which model is better suited for concealed carry?
The Model 36’s shrouded hammer generally makes it preferable for concealed carry due to the reduced risk of snagging during the draw.
Question 3: What are the advantages of an exposed hammer on the Model 37?
The exposed hammer allows for single-action firing, resulting in a lighter trigger pull and potentially improved accuracy.
Question 4: Can both models fire the same ammunition?
Yes, both the Model 36 and Model 37 are chambered for .38 Special cartridges.
Question 5: Are there significant differences in size and weight between the two models?
Size and weight differences are minimal. Both are built on the compact J-frame and possess similar dimensions and weight.
Question 6: Which model is recommended for individuals new to revolvers?
The Model 36’s simpler operation, with its exclusive double-action mode, might be preferable for those unfamiliar with revolvers.
Understanding these key distinctions facilitates informed selection based on individual needs and preferences. The choice between the Model 36 and Model 37 hinges on prioritizing concealed carry convenience versus the versatility of single-action firing.
Further sections will delve into specific use cases, maintenance considerations, and the historical context of these iconic revolvers within the Smith & Wesson product line.
Tips for Selecting Between a Smith & Wesson Model 36 and Model 37
Choosing between the Model 36 and Model 37 requires careful consideration of individual needs and priorities. These tips offer guidance for making an informed decision based on specific use cases and preferences.
Tip 1: Prioritize Concealment Needs: Individuals prioritizing deep concealment for personal defense should strongly consider the Model 36. Its shrouded hammer significantly reduces the risk of snagging on clothing during the draw, crucial for rapid deployment in self-defense situations.
Tip 2: Evaluate Shooting Preferences: Those who value the option of single-action fire for enhanced accuracy should examine the Model 37. The exposed hammer allows for both single and double-action operation, providing versatility for target practice and potentially improved precision in defensive scenarios.
Tip 3: Consider Holster Compatibility: Holster availability varies considerably between the two models. The Model 36’s shrouded hammer offers broader compatibility with various holster types, including pocket holsters and IWB options. The Model 37’s exposed hammer may limit holster choices. Research appropriate holsters before making a purchase.
Tip 4: Assess Experience Level: Individuals new to revolvers might find the Model 36’s exclusive double-action operation more straightforward. The consistent trigger pull simplifies operation and reduces the learning curve associated with transitioning between single and double-action modes.
Tip 5: Evaluate Intended Use: Determine the primary purpose of the revolver. For exclusively concealed carry, the Model 36 offers advantages. For a balance of concealed carry and range use, where single-action precision is desired, the Model 37 might be more suitable.
Tip 6: Handle Both Models: If possible, handle both the Model 36 and Model 37 before making a decision. This allows for assessment of grip comfort, trigger reach, and overall feel, factors crucial for confident and effective handling.
Tip 7: Research Ammunition Compatibility: While both models chamber .38 Special, certain +P (higher pressure) ammunition may be unsuitable for older or specific variants. Verify ammunition compatibility for the chosen model to ensure safe and reliable operation.
Careful consideration of these tips, coupled with thorough research, will guide the selection process and ensure the chosen revolver aligns with individual needs, preferences, and intended applications.
The concluding section will summarize the key features and benefits of each model, offering a final comparative overview to solidify the decision-making process.
Final Assessment
The Smith & Wesson Model 36 and Model 37, both iconic J-frame revolvers, offer distinct advantages based on individual needs. The Model 36, with its shrouded hammer, excels in concealed carry scenarios due to its snag-free design, prioritizing speed and reliability in self-defense situations. Conversely, the Model 37’s exposed hammer provides the versatility of single-action firing, enhancing accuracy for deliberate shots and offering flexibility for both concealed carry and range use. The choice ultimately hinges on a balance between concealed carry convenience and the desire for single-action precision. Careful consideration of holster compatibility, shooting preferences, and anticipated use cases are critical factors in making an informed decision.
The enduring popularity of both revolvers speaks to their reliability and effectiveness. Selecting the appropriate model involves a thorough understanding of personal needs and priorities. This comparison serves as a foundation for making an informed choice, empowering individuals to select the revolver that best aligns with their specific requirements and empowers them with confidence in their chosen personal defense tool.